Allbrand Discount Liquors, Inc. v. Times Square Stores Corp.

60 A.D.2d 568, 399 N.Y.S.2d 700, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14499
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 5, 1977
StatusPublished
Cited by29 cases

This text of 60 A.D.2d 568 (Allbrand Discount Liquors, Inc. v. Times Square Stores Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Allbrand Discount Liquors, Inc. v. Times Square Stores Corp., 60 A.D.2d 568, 399 N.Y.S.2d 700, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14499 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Opinion

In an action by a lessee to recover damages for anticipatory breach of a commercial lease, the defendant appeals from (1) a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered March 16, 1977, which is in favor of plaintiff and against it, after a nonjury trial, and (2) an order of the same court, dated June 1, 1977, which denied its motion, inter alia, to vacate the judgment. Judgment and order affirmed, with one bill of costs to cover both appeals. The trial court’s finding that the lessor anticipatorily breached its lease when it told the lessee that it "could not live” with the lease as drawn and would not allow the lessee to take possession without renegotiation, was correct. Once it becomes clear that one party will not live up to the contract, the aggrieved party is relieved from the performance of futile acts, such as conditions precedent (Kooleraire Serv. & Installation Corp. v Board of Educ., 28 NY2d 101, 106). Thus, the failure of the lessee to apply for a liquor license is excusable, since it was not required to do so after it was told by the lessor that it would not be allowed to take possession under the lease. Finally, the failure of the trial court to consider evidence concerning the effect of the cost of living provision on the value of the leasehold was not improper, in view of the fact that no such evidence was ever offered at the trial (see Matter of Port of N. Y. Auth. [Lincoln Tunnel—Swift Co.], 1 AD2d 801). Rabin, J. P., Shapiro, Suozzi and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Eisner v. Cusumano Construction, Inc.
132 A.D.3d 940 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
L-7 Designs, Inc. v. Old Navy, LLC
964 F. Supp. 2d 299 (S.D. New York, 2013)
Price v. Cushman & Wakefield, Inc.
808 F. Supp. 2d 670 (S.D. New York, 2011)
Traxys North America, LLC v. Concept Mining, Inc.
808 F. Supp. 2d 853 (W.D. Virginia, 2011)
L-7 Designs, Inc. v. Old Navy, LLC
647 F.3d 419 (Second Circuit, 2011)
L-7 v. Old Navy
Second Circuit, 2011
Sea Tow Services International, Inc. v. Pontin
607 F. Supp. 2d 378 (E.D. New York, 2009)
Gallo v. Alitalia—Linee Aeree Italiane—Societa Per Azioni
585 F. Supp. 2d 520 (S.D. New York, 2008)
24/7 Records, Inc. v. Sony Music Entertainment, Inc.
566 F. Supp. 2d 305 (S.D. New York, 2008)
J. Petrocelli Construction, Inc. v. Realm Electrical Contractors, Inc.
15 A.D.3d 444 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
East Main Street Realty Corp. v. Bernstein
282 A.D.2d 428 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Housing Help, Inc. v. Kasper-Staller Venture
196 A.D.2d 805 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
Bausch & Lomb Inc. v. Bressler
977 F.2d 720 (Second Circuit, 1992)
Bausch & Lomb Incorporated v. Bernard Bressler
977 F.2d 720 (Second Circuit, 1992)
150/160 Associates v. Mojo-Stumer Architects, Inc.
174 A.D.2d 658 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
V.A. Tellis v. Briamar Associates
167 A.D.2d 384 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
60 A.D.2d 568, 399 N.Y.S.2d 700, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14499, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/allbrand-discount-liquors-inc-v-times-square-stores-corp-nyappdiv-1977.