All the Way East Fourth St. Block Ass'n v. Ryan-NENA Community Health Center

30 A.D.3d 182, 817 N.Y.S.2d 14
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 8, 2006
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 30 A.D.3d 182 (All the Way East Fourth St. Block Ass'n v. Ryan-NENA Community Health Center) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
All the Way East Fourth St. Block Ass'n v. Ryan-NENA Community Health Center, 30 A.D.3d 182, 817 N.Y.S.2d 14 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Walter B. Tolub, J.), entered October 7, 2005, which denied plaintiffs’ motion for a declaration that they held absolute title in fee simple to property known as the East Third Street side of the Orchard Alley Community Garden, denied plaintiffs’ motion for preliminary and permanent injunctive relief, granted defendants’ cross motion to dismiss the complaint and for an order of ejectment, and awarded defendants full and exclusive use and possession of the subject property, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Dismissal of the complaint on the grounds of vague, conclusory and unsubstantiated allegations was warranted (see Gordon v Dino De Laurentiis Corp., 141 AD2d 435 [1988]). “[M]ere occupancy for an extended period of years coupled with open conduct consistent with ownership, but absent an initial claim of right,” may not ripen into ownership by adverse possession (see Joseph v Whitcombe, 279 AD2d 122, 124 [2001]). Defendants demonstrated that plaintiffs did not enter into occupancy of the lot under claim of right. Plaintiffs’ claim of a prescriptive easement was also properly dismissed. While entry under a claim of right for a prescriptive easement might be presumed, the presumption herein was defeated. The claimed prescriptive right to use the lot as a community garden would constitute a taking inconsistent with an easement (see Di Leo v Pecksto Holding Corp., 304 NY 505, 512 [1952]).

[183]*183We have considered plaintiffs’ remaining arguments and find them without merit. Concur—Buckley, RJ., Mazzarelli, Saxe, Williams and McGuire, JJ. [See 9 Misc 3d 1122(A), 2005 NY Slip Op 51743(U).]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Moreno-Godoy v. Kartagener
7 F.4th 78 (Second Circuit, 2021)
Children's Magical Garden, Inc. v. Norfolk St. Dev., LLC
2018 NY Slip Op 5223 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
Merget v. Westbury Properties, LLC
65 A.D.3d 1102 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Keena v. Hudmor Corp.
37 A.D.3d 172 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
30 A.D.3d 182, 817 N.Y.S.2d 14, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/all-the-way-east-fourth-st-block-assn-v-ryan-nena-community-health-nyappdiv-2006.