Alker v. Philadelphia National Bank
This text of 93 A.2d 699 (Alker v. Philadelphia National Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Alker, Appellant,
v.
The Philadelphia National Bank.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Before STERN, C.J., JONES, BELL, CHIDSEY and MUSMANNO, JJ.
*338 Lemuel B. Schofield, with him Edwin Hall, 2nd, and Harry J. Alker, Jr., for appellant.
Arthur Littleton, with him John R. McConnell and Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, for appellee.
OPINION PER CURIAM, January 12, 1953:
The Judgment of Non Pros is affirmed on the Opinion of President Judge FRANK SMITH.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
93 A.2d 699, 372 Pa. 327, 1953 Pa. LEXIS 514, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alker-v-philadelphia-national-bank-pa-1953.