Alkek v. State

22 S.W.2d 454
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Alkek v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 113 Tex. Crim. 400
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided December 4, 1929·No. No. 12838·Published

Opinion

MARTIN, J.

The transcript in this case shows that appellant ■ was convicted in the corporation court of the city of Victoria of a misdemeanor and fined $25. Prom this conviction he appealed to the county court of Victoria county, and, upon a trial de novo in [455]*455that court, was fined $10, irom which judgment of conviction he appeals to this court.

This, being a case appealed from an inferi- or court to' the county court, the fine imposed in such court not exceeding $100, could not be appealed to the Court of Criminal Appeals ; it being without jurisdiction under the express terms of article 53, Code Cr. Broc. 1025. See, also, Neubauer v. State, 31 Tex. Cr. R. 513, 21 S. W. 363; Allen v. State, 74 Tex. Cr. R. 25, 167 S. W. 342; Ruck v. State, 106 Tex. Cr. R. 140, 290 S. W. 1094.

The appeal is dismissed.

PER CURIAM. The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Alkek v. State, 22 S.W.2d 454 (Tex. 1929).

22 S.W.2d 454 (Alkek v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Luck v. State
291 S.W. 1094 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1927)
Neubauer v. State
21 S.W. 363 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1893)
Allen v. State
167 S.W. 342 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1914)
Luck v. State
290 S.W. 1094 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1927)