Neubauer v. State

21 S.W. 363, 31 Tex. Crim. 513, 1893 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 153
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided February 3, 1893·No. No. 105.·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

DAVIDSON, Judge.

1. The recognizance binds the appellant to “ abide the judgment of the Court of Appeals,” and was entered into by him on November 12,1892. There was at that date no such court known to the laws of this State. The recognizance should have bound the appellant to abide the judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeals, as required by the Act of 1892, page 38, section 32. Cummings v. The State, ante, p. 406.

2. This cause originated in the Mayor’s Court, and on appeal to the County Court defendant was fined in the sum of $5. The judgment, therefore, became final in that court. Where, on an appeal to the County Court from an inferior court, the fine imposed or judgment rendered in a criminal cause shall not exceed $100, exclusive of costs, the judgment shall be final in the County Court. The motion of the Assistant Attorney-General is sustained on both grounds, and the appeal is dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

Hurt, P. J., concurs. Simkins, J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Neubauer v. State, 21 S.W. 363, 31 Tex. Crim. 513, 1893 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 153 (Tex. 1893).

21 S.W. 363 (Neubauer v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Harrison v. State
79 S.W.2d 1094 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1935)
Williams v. State
76 S.W.2d 137 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1934)
Mays v. State
36 S.W.2d 508 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1931)
Alkek v. State
22 S.W.2d 454 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1929)
McDonald v. State
257 S.W. 889 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1924)
Haak v. State
132 S.W. 357 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1910)