Alice M Brown v. City of Sault Ste Marie

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Alice M Brown v. City of Sault Ste Marie. Read the opinion of the Court — 910 N.W.2d 300
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided June 21, 2017·No. 154851·Published

Opinion

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

June 21, 2017 Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack 154851 David F. Viviano Richard H. Bernstein Joan L. Larsen Kurtis T. Wilder, ALICE M. BROWN, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee, v SC: 154851 COA: 330508 Chippewa CC: 14-013459-NO CITY OF SAULT STE MARIE, ERIC FOUNTAIN, GREG SCHMITIGAL, MIKE BREAKIE, JEFF KILLIPS, and BRUCE LIPPONEN, Defendants-Appellants.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 20, 2016 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral argument on whether to grant the application or take other action. MCR 7.305(H)(1). The parties shall file supplemental briefs within 42 days of the date of this order addressing whether the Court of Appeals properly applied MCL 691.1404(1) (“[t]he notice shall specify . . . the injury sustained . . .”) when it concluded that the plaintiff’s notice, “when read as a whole,” was adequate because the notice “referenced documents” that more fully described the plaintiff’s injuries. The parties should not submit mere restatements of their application papers.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. June 21, 2017 s0614 Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Alice M Brown v. City of Sault Ste Marie, (Mich. 2017).

Alice M Brown v. City of Sault Ste Marie (Alice M Brown v. City of Sault Ste Marie) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.