Algonquin Steel Technologies, Inc. v. Connecticut Compressed Gas, Inc.
743 A.2d 613, 252 Conn. 112, 2000 Conn. LEXIS 4
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Algonquin Steel Technologies, Inc. v. Connecticut Compressed Gas, Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 248 Conn. 919 →
Opinion
Opinion
After examining the record on appeal and considering the briefs and oral arguments of the parties, we have determined that the appeal in this case [113] should be dismissed on the ground that certification1 was improvidently granted.
The appeal is dismissed.
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Algonquin Steel Technologies, Inc. v. Connecticut Compressed Gas, Inc., 743 A.2d 613, 252 Conn. 112, 2000 Conn. LEXIS 4 (Colo. 2000).
743 A.2d 613 (Algonquin Steel Technologies, Inc. v. Connecticut Compressed Gas, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Algonquin Steel Technologies, Inc. v. Connecticut Compressed Gas, Inc.
734 A.2d 565 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1999)