Algonquin Steel Technologies, Inc. v. Connecticut Compressed Gas, Inc.

743 A.2d 613, 252 Conn. 112, 2000 Conn. LEXIS 4
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Algonquin Steel Technologies, Inc. v. Connecticut Compressed Gas, Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 248 Conn. 919
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided January 25, 2000·No. SC 16101·Published

Opinion

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

After examining the record on appeal and considering the briefs and oral arguments of the parties, we have determined that the appeal in this case [113] should be dismissed on the ground that certification1 was improvidently granted.

The appeal is dismissed.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Algonquin Steel Technologies, Inc. v. Connecticut Compressed Gas, Inc., 743 A.2d 613, 252 Conn. 112, 2000 Conn. LEXIS 4 (Colo. 2000).

743 A.2d 613 (Algonquin Steel Technologies, Inc. v. Connecticut Compressed Gas, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Algonquin Steel Technologies, Inc. v. Connecticut Compressed Gas, Inc.
734 A.2d 565 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1999)