Algonquin Steel Technologies, Inc. v. Connecticut Compressed Gas, Inc.
734 A.2d 565, 248 Conn. 919, 1999 Conn. LEXIS 166
Opinion
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court (AC 19024) is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Did the Appellate Court properly dismiss the defendant’s appeal?”
MCDONALD, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Algonquin Steel Technologies, Inc. v. Connecticut Compressed Gas, Inc., 734 A.2d 565, 248 Conn. 919, 1999 Conn. LEXIS 166 (Colo. 1999).
734 A.2d 565 (Algonquin Steel Technologies, Inc. v. Connecticut Compressed Gas, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Algonquin Steel Technologies, Inc. v. Connecticut Compressed Gas, Inc.
743 A.2d 613 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2000)