Alfred Taylor v. Dr. George J. Beto, Director, Texas Department of Corrections

346 F.2d 157, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 5472
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided May 24, 1965·No. 21735_1·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

As is true in Reyes v. Beto, 5 Cir., 1965, 345 F.2d 722, decided by us this date, this appeal challenges the constitutional fairness of the Texas procedure oj allowing the indictment allegations oi prior felony convictions to be read to the jury in a Habitual Offender prosecution. The District Court’s decision must likewise be affirmed on the basis of Breen v. Beto, 5 Cir., 1965, 341 F.2d 96. See also Reed v. Beto, 5 Cir., 1965, 343 F.2d 723 [April 7, 1965]; see Stephens v. State, 1964, Tex.Cr.App., 377 S.W.2d 189, cert. denied, 1965, 85 S.Ct. 1344 [April 26, 1965].

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Alfred Taylor v. Dr. George J. Beto, Director, Texas Department of Corrections, 346 F.2d 157, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 5472 (5th Cir. 1965).

346 F.2d 157 (Alfred Taylor v. Dr. George J. Beto, Director, Texas Department of Corrections) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Taylor v. State
398 S.W.2d 559 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1966)
United States ex rel. Jenkins v. Follette
257 F. Supp. 533 (S.D. New York, 1965)
Fletcher v. State
396 S.W.2d 393 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1965)