Alfred Moreno and Emma Moreno v. Sterling Drug, Inc., Camilla Sloan and James Sloan v. Sterling Drug, Inc.

899 F.2d 389, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 6733, 1990 WL 41955
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedApril 30, 1990
Docket87-5583
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 899 F.2d 389 (Alfred Moreno and Emma Moreno v. Sterling Drug, Inc., Camilla Sloan and James Sloan v. Sterling Drug, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Alfred Moreno and Emma Moreno v. Sterling Drug, Inc., Camilla Sloan and James Sloan v. Sterling Drug, Inc., 899 F.2d 389, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 6733, 1990 WL 41955 (5th Cir. 1990).

Opinion

ON CERTIFICATION TO THE TEXAS SUPREME COURT

PER CURIAM:

On July 22, 1988 we certified two questions to the Texas Supreme Court:

1. Does the “discovery rule” apply to the Texas Statute of Limitations, TEX. CIV.PRAC. & REM.CODE § 16.003(b), in an action brought pursuant to the Texas Wrongful Death and Survival Statutes, TEX.CIV.PRAC. & REM.CODE § 71.001 et seq. and § 71.021, respectively?
2. If the discovery rule does not apply to the Texas Statute of Limitations in wrongful death and survival actions, does that statute of limitations, as applied to the plaintiffs herein, violate the open courts provision of the Constitution of the State of Texas, TEX. CONST, art. I, § 13?

By an opinion delivered March 28, 1990 and filed with this court on April 2, 1990, the Texas Supreme Court ruled that the discovery rule did not apply to the wrongful death statute of limitations and that the statute of limitations as thus applicable to the plaintiffs herein did not violate the open courts provision of the Constitution of the State of Texas. 787 S.W.2d 348.

It is now our duty to apply the law of Texas, as interpreted by Texas’ highest court, to the suits at bar. The district court a quo granted summary judgments in favor of Sterling Drug, Inc. and dismissed as time barred the claims of the plaintiff. Guided by the responses of the Texas Supreme Court to our certified questions, the judgments of the district court in these two cases are AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dannelley v. Almond as Next Friend of Almond
827 S.W.2d 582 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
899 F.2d 389, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 6733, 1990 WL 41955, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alfred-moreno-and-emma-moreno-v-sterling-drug-inc-camilla-sloan-and-ca5-1990.