Alfano v. Miller Environmental Group, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Alfano v. Miller Environmental Group, Inc.

253 A.D.2d 446, 675 N.Y.S.2d 311, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8853

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedAugust 10, 1998

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 253 A.D.2d 446 (Alfano v. Miller Environmental Group, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Alfano v. Miller Environmental Group, Inc., 253 A.D.2d 446, 675 N.Y.S.2d 311, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8853 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for age and gender discrimination in violation of Executive Law § 296, the defendant appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (DiNoto, J.), dated December 23, 1997, as denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed.

Assuming that the plaintiff demonstrated a prima facie case of discrimination, the defendant succeeded in establishing that the alleged adverse employment decision was based on legitimate, independent, and nondiscriminatory reasons (see, Ferrante v American Lung Assn., 90 NY2d 623; Matter of Miller Brewing Co. v State Div. of Human Rights, 66 NY2d 937). The plaintiff failed to raise material issues of fact as to whether the reasons given were false and whether her age or gender was the real reason (see, Ferrante v American Lung Assn., supra; Matter of Laverack & Haines v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 88 NY2d 734). Accordingly, the Supreme Court erred in denying the defendant’s motion for summary judgment. Bracken, J. P., Copertino, McGinity and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for age and gender discrimination in violation of Executive Law § 296, the defendant appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (DiNoto, J.), dated December 23, 1997, as denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed.

Assuming that the plaintiff demonstrated a prima facie case of discrimination, the defendant succeeded in establishing that the alleged adverse employment decision was based on legitimate, independent, and nondiscriminatory reasons (see, Ferrante v American Lung Assn., 90 NY2d 623; Matter of Miller Brewing Co. v State Div. of Human Rights, 66 NY2d 937). The plaintiff failed to raise material issues of fact as to whether the reasons given were false and whether her age or gender was the real reason (see, Ferrante v American Lung Assn., supra; Matter of Laverack & Haines v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 88 NY2d 734). Accordingly, the Supreme Court erred in denying the defendant’s motion for summary judgment. Bracken, J. P., Copertino, McGinity and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

253 A.D.2d 446, 675 N.Y.S.2d 311, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8853, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alfano-v-miller-environmental-group-inc-nyappdiv-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack