Alexis Edelstein v. Tara Michelle Nelson
Opinion
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA
3 ALEXIS EDELSTEIN, 4 Petitioner, Case No.: 2:25-cv-00003-GMN-MDC 5 vs. 6 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND TARA MICHELLE NELSON, RECOMMENDATION 7 Respondent. 8
9 Pending before the Court is the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”), (ECF No. 53), 10 from United States Magistrate Judge Maximiliano D. Couvillier, III, which recommends 11 denying the Motion for Attorneys’ Fees, (ECF No. 46), filed by Respondent Tara Michelle 12 Nelson. 13 A party may file specific written objections to the findings and recommendations of a 14 United States Magistrate Judge made pursuant to Local Rule IB 1-4. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B); 15 D. Nev. R. IB 3-2. Upon the filing of such objections, the Court must make a de novo 16 determination of those portions to which objections are made if the Magistrate Judge’s findings 17 and recommendations concern matters that may not be finally determined by a magistrate 18 judge. D. Nev. R. IB 3-2(b). The Court may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the 19 findings or recommendations made by the Magistrate Judge. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); D. Nev. R. 20 IB 3-2(b). Where a party fails to object, however, the Court is not required to conduct “any 21 review at all . . . of any issue that is not the subject of an objection.” Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 22 140, 149 (1985) (citing 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)). Indeed, the Ninth Circuit has recognized that a 23 district court is not required to review a magistrate judge’s R&R where no objections have been 24 filed. See, e.g., United States v. Reyna–Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1122 (9th Cir. 2003). 25 Here, no objections were filed, and the deadline to do so has passed. (See R&R, ECF 1 ||No. 53) (setting a November 26, 2025 deadline for objections). 2 3 Accordingly, 4 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation, (ECF No. 53), is 5 || ACCEPTED and ADOPTED in full. 6 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion for Attorneys’ Fees, (ECF No. 46), is 7 DENIED. 8 Dated this 3 day of December, 2025.
10 □□ Gloriaj/M. Navarro, District Judge United States District Court 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Page 2 of 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Alexis Edelstein v. Tara Michelle Nelson (Alexis Edelstein v. Tara Michelle Nelson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.