Alexander v. State

68 S.W.2d 501, 125 Tex. Crim. 371, 1934 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 100
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 21, 1934
DocketNo. 16395.
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 68 S.W.2d 501 (Alexander v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Alexander v. State, 68 S.W.2d 501, 125 Tex. Crim. 371, 1934 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 100 (Tex. 1934).

Opinion

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The offense is assault with intent to rape; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

The record is before this court without statement of facts or bills of exception.

The indictment is defective to a degree that renders a reversal of the judgment necessary in that it fails to allege that the female, who was under the age of consent, was not the wife of the appellant. Throughout the history of the jurisprudence of this state, an indictment omitting such averment has been regarded as insufficient to charge the offense. See Bullock v. State, 54 S. W. (2d) 91, and precedents therein cited.

The judgment is reversed and the prosecution ordered dismissed.

Reversed, and prosecution ordered dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wells v. State
81 S.W.2d 89 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1935)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
68 S.W.2d 501, 125 Tex. Crim. 371, 1934 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 100, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alexander-v-state-texcrimapp-1934.