Alexander v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Alexander v. State

950 S.W.2d 257, 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 1250, 1997 WL 374474

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Alexander v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 1104 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided July 8, 1997·No. No. 71365·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Roland Davis, appeals the judgment entered by the Circuit Court of St. Louis County denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an eviden-tiary hearing. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the judgment of the motion court is not clearly erroneous. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the motion court pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Roland Davis, appeals the judgment entered by the Circuit Court of St. Louis County denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an eviden-tiary hearing. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the judgment of the motion court is not clearly erroneous. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the motion court pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Alexander v. State, 950 S.W.2d 257, 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 1250, 1997 WL 374474 (Mo. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

950 S.W.2d 257 (Alexander v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.