Alexander v. State

914 S.W.2d 74, 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 96, 1996 WL 23622
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedJanuary 23, 1996
DocketNo. 67875
StatusPublished

This text of 914 S.W.2d 74 (Alexander v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Alexander v. State, 914 S.W.2d 74, 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 96, 1996 WL 23622 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On November 12, 1993, movant, Alvin Eugene Alexander, was delivered to the Missouri Department of Corrections to serve a seven year sentence on his plea of guilty to the charge of stealing over $150 and a concurrent one year sentence on the charge of resisting arrest. On August 15, 1994, he filed a Rule 24.035 motion for post conviction relief.

The motion court dismissed the motion as untimely under Rule 24.035(b). The rule allows ninety days after delivery to the custody of the Department of Corrections to file a motion for post conviction relief. “The time limitations contained in Rules 24.035 and 29.15 are valid and mandatory.” Day v. State, 770 S.W.2d 692, 695 (Mo. banc 1989). Dismissal of the motion was mandatory.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Day v. State
770 S.W.2d 692 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
914 S.W.2d 74, 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 96, 1996 WL 23622, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alexander-v-state-moctapp-1996.