Alexander v. State
602 So. 2d 697, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 9067, 1992 WL 191279
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Alexander v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 553 So. 2d 312 →
Opinion
Appellant seeks review of the trial court’s order denying her rule 3.800(a) motion to correct illegal sentence. We find merit in appellant’s contentions. Accordingly, we reverse and remand with directions to vacate that portion of appellant’s five-year term of community control which exceeds two years. See § 948.001, Fla.Stat. (1987); § 948.03(2)(b), Fla.Stat. (1987); Yourn v. State, 579 So.2d 309 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991); Crawford v. State, 567 So.2d 428 (Fla.1990).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Alexander v. State, 602 So. 2d 697, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 9067, 1992 WL 191279 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).
602 So. 2d 697 (Alexander v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Crawford v. State
567 So. 2d 428 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1990)
Yourn v. State
579 So. 2d 309 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)