Alexander v. State

568 So. 2d 1341, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 8407, 1990 WL 168328
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 31, 1990·No. No. 89-3234·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ERVIN, Judge.

The upward departure sentence imposed upon appellant is reversed and remanded. The trial court is directed on remand to impose a sentence within the guidelines. Pope v. State, 561 So.2d 554 (Fla.1990).

We approve, however, the type of sentence imposed — a probationary split sentence. Poore v. State, 531 So.2d 161 (Fla.1988); Glass v. State, 556 So.2d 465 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990), petition for review filed, No. 75,600 (Fla. Feb. 27, 1990) (oral argument scheduled Dec. 6, 1990). As in Glass, however, we certify the following question to the supreme court as one of great public importance:

DOES A DOUBLE JEOPARDY VIOLATION RESULT FROM THE IMPOSITION OF A PROBATIONARY SPLIT SENTENCE WHEN THE LEGISLATURE HAS NOT EXPLICITLY AUTHORIZED THAT DISPOSITION IN THE SENTENCING ALTERNATIVES OF SECTION 921.187, FLORIDA STATUTES?

REVERSED and REMANDED in part, and APPROVED in part.

BOOTH and BARFIELD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Alexander v. State, 568 So. 2d 1341, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 8407, 1990 WL 168328 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

568 So. 2d 1341 (Alexander v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sumter v. State
570 So. 2d 1039 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)