Alexander v. Oklahoma
391 F.3d 1155, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 25755, 2004 WL 2851862
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit·Decided December 13, 2004·No. No. 04-5042·Published·Cited by 27 cases
Opinions
[1159] ORDER
The appellants’ petition for rehearing is denied by the panel that rendered the decision.
The suggestion for rehearing en banc was transmitted to all of the judges of the court who are in regular active service. A poll was requested and a majority of the active judges voted to deny rehearing en banc. Judges Seymour, Henry, Lucero, and Hartz voted to grant rehearing. Judge Lucero filed a dissent from the denial of rehearing en banc, and he was joined in this dissent by Judge Seymour.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Alexander v. Oklahoma, 391 F.3d 1155, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 25755, 2004 WL 2851862 (10th Cir. 2004).
391 F.3d 1155 (Alexander v. Oklahoma) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Weaver (ID 112321) v. Kansas, State of
D. Kansas, 2024
Thayer v. Howard
D. Kansas, 2024
Neill v. Godinez
D. Kansas, 2023
Barnett (ID 86695) v. Wichita Police Department, City of
D. Kansas, 2022
Gilmore v. Easter
D. Kansas, 2022
White (ID 76983) v. Schmidt
D. Kansas, 2022
Wicks v. Winger
D. Kansas, 2022
McDade v. Corizon Health
D. Kansas, 2022
Frantz (ID 124145) v. Kansas, State of
D. Kansas, 2021
Courson v. Reno County, Kansas, Board of Commissioners
D. Kansas, 2021
Allen v. State of Kansas
D. Kansas, 2021
Cheatham v. Schwab
D. Kansas, 2021
Heide (ID 108654) v. Satterfield
D. Kansas, 2021
Lowery v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
D. Kansas, 2021
Vann v. Fewell
D. Kansas, 2020
Payton (ID 66352) v. Kelly
D. Kansas, 2020
Hall (ID 57105) v. Kansas, State of
D. Kansas, 2020
Spight v. Heimgartner
D. Kansas, 2020
White v. Salina, Kansas, City of
D. Kansas, 2020