Alexander v. New York City Department of Education

S.D. New York

Alexander v. New York City Department of Education

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided March 18, 2022·No. 1:19-cv-07023·Unknown

Opinion

USDC SDNY DOCUMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ELECTRONICALLY FILED SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DOC #: DATE FILED:_ 3/18/2022 Brendamarie Alexander, Plaintiff, 1:19-cv-07023 (AJN) (SDA) -against- ORDER New York City Department of Education et al., Defendants.

STEWART D. AARON, United States Magistrate Judge: Following a telephone conference with the parties, and for the reasons stated on the record, it is hereby Ordered as follows: 1. Defendants’ Motion to Seal (ECF No. 56) is GRANTED. The Letter Motion filed at ECF No. 54, which includes unredacted copies of Plaintiff's medical records, shall remain under seal. Accord Spring v. Allegany-Limestone Cent. Sch. Dist., No. 14-CV-0476S, 2021 WL 4166628, at *1 (W.D.N.Y. Sept. 14, 2021) (“[C]ourts in this circuit regularly allow medical records to be filed under seal, finding that parties have a strong privacy interest in their medical information.”) (citing cases). A redacted version of the Letter Motion is on the public docket at ECF No. 55. Plaintiff does not seek to seal her response to Defendants’ Letter Motion (see ECF No. 58) and, thus, the Court will unseal that document. 2. Defendants’ Letter Motion (ECF No. 63) is DENIED AS MOOT. The parties shall meet and confer regarding any continuation of Plaintiff’s deposition.

The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to unseal the document filed at ECF No. 58 and terminate the motion at ECF No. 64. SO ORDERED. DATED: New York, New York March 18, 2022

STEWARTD.AARON United States Magistrate Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

USDC SDNY DOCUMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ELECTRONICALLY FILED SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DOC #: DATE FILED:_ 3/18/2022 Brendamarie Alexander, Plaintiff, 1:19-cv-07023 (AJN) (SDA) -against- ORDER New York City Department of Education et al., Defendants.

STEWART D. AARON, United States Magistrate Judge: Following a telephone conference with the parties, and for the reasons stated on the record, it is hereby Ordered as follows: 1. Defendants’ Motion to Seal (ECF No. 56) is GRANTED. The Letter Motion filed at ECF No. 54, which includes unredacted copies of Plaintiff's medical records, shall remain under seal. Accord Spring v. Allegany-Limestone Cent. Sch. Dist., No. 14-CV-0476S, 2021 WL 4166628, at *1 (W.D.N.Y. Sept. 14, 2021) (“[C]ourts in this circuit regularly allow medical records to be filed under seal, finding that parties have a strong privacy interest in their medical information.”) (citing cases). A redacted version of the Letter Motion is on the public docket at ECF No. 55. Plaintiff does not seek to seal her response to Defendants’ Letter Motion (see ECF No. 58) and, thus, the Court will unseal that document. 2. Defendants’ Letter Motion (ECF No. 63) is DENIED AS MOOT. The parties shall meet and confer regarding any continuation of Plaintiff’s deposition.

The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to unseal the document filed at ECF No. 58 and terminate the motion at ECF No. 64. SO ORDERED. DATED: New York, New York March 18, 2022

STEWARTD.AARON United States Magistrate Judge

Alexander v. New York City Department of Education, (S.D.N.Y. 2022).

Pincite

Alexander v. New York City Department of Education (Alexander v. New York City Department of Education) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.