Alexander, Guy Stephen
This text of Alexander, Guy Stephen (Alexander, Guy Stephen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is a subsequent application for a writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, Article 11.071, Section 5.
In August 1989, a jury convicted applicant of the offense of capital murder. The jury answered the special issues submitted pursuant to Texas Code of Criminal Procedure Article 37.071, and the trial court, accordingly, set punishment at death. This Court affirmed applicant's conviction and sentence on direct appeal. Alexander v. State, No. 70,941 (Tex. Crim. App., April 14, 1993). On January 16, 2001, applicant filed his initial application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to Article 11.071. We denied relief. Ex parte Alexander, No. WR-57,156-01 (Tex. Crim. App., Nov. 5, 2003).
In a single allegation in this subsequent application, applicant asserts that he is entitled to relief from his death sentence because he presented significant mitigating evidence related to his moral culpability and the appropriateness of a death sentence that could not have been given full effect by the sentencing jury. See Penry v. Johnson, 532 U.S. 782 (2001). We have reviewed the application and find that the allegation satisfies the requirements of Article 11.071 § 5. Accordingly, we remand the application to the trial court for consideration of Applicant's claim.
IT IS SO ORDERED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF JUNE, 2010.
Do Not Publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Alexander, Guy Stephen, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alexander-guy-stephen-texcrimapp-2010.