Home/Idaho Supreme Court/Alesko v. Union Pacific Railroad

Alesko v. Union Pacific Railroad

109 P.2d 874, 62 Idaho 235, 1941 Ida. LEXIS 4
CourtIdaho Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 22, 1941
DocketNo. 6817.
StatusPublished
Cited by29 cases

This text of 109 P.2d 874 (Alesko v. Union Pacific Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Idaho Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Alesko v. Union Pacific Railroad, 109 P.2d 874, 62 Idaho 235, 1941 Ida. LEXIS 4 (Idaho 1941).

Opinion

GIVENS, J.

Appellant sued to recover damages for the flooding of his homesite (buildings and yard shown in pictures below) and washing the top soil therefrom charged to have been occasioned by the negligent construction and maintenance of respondent’s pile-supported trestle, south and up stream from appellant’s premises, impeding and deflecting flood waters in Big Creek, Shoshone county, April 1938.

*238 Plaintiff’s Exhibits 2, 6, and 3, graphically portray the situation before and during the flood:

*239 R0DURva15tFM02YwX3G7vmPdZX7yhQ

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Whitham v. Creamer
525 P.3d 746 (Idaho Supreme Court, 2023)
Adams v. United States
823 F. Supp. 2d 1074 (D. Idaho, 2011)
Weitz v. Green
230 P.3d 743 (Idaho Supreme Court, 2010)
Farr West Investments v. Topaz Marketing L.P.
220 P.3d 1091 (Idaho Supreme Court, 2009)
Ransom v. Topaz Marketing, L.P.
152 P.3d 2 (Idaho Supreme Court, 2006)
Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District v. Mussell
72 P.3d 868 (Idaho Supreme Court, 2003)
La. Dotd v. Kansas City Southern Rwy. Co.
846 So. 2d 734 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 2003)
Bumgarner v. Bumgarner
862 P.2d 321 (Idaho Court of Appeals, 1993)
Marty v. State
838 P.2d 1384 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1992)
Jacobsen v. Schroder
788 P.2d 843 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1990)
Brinkman v. Aid Insurance Co.
766 P.2d 1227 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1988)
State of Idaho v. Hanna Min. Co.
699 F. Supp. 827 (D. Idaho, 1987)
United States v. City of Twin Falls
806 F.2d 862 (Ninth Circuit, 1986)
United States v. The City of Twin Falls, Idaho, the City of Twin Falls, Idaho, Third-Party v. Hamilton and Voeller, Inc., an Idaho Corporation Detweiler Bros., Inc., an Idaho Corporation Envirotech Corporation, D/B/A Envirotech Systems, Inc., a Foreign Corporation Doing Business in Idaho, Third-Party Defendants/ United States of America v. The City of Twin Falls, Idaho, the City of Twin Falls, Idaho, Third-Party v. Hamilton and Voeller, Inc., an Idaho Corporation, Third-Party and Envirotech Corporation, D/B/A Envirotech Systems, Inc., Third-Party
806 F.2d 862 (Third Circuit, 1986)
Briscoe v. Harper Oil Co.
1985 OK 43 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1985)
Shaw v. City of Rupert
681 P.2d 1001 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1984)
Lasselle v. Special Products Co.
677 P.2d 483 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1983)
Cheney v. Palos Verdes Investment Corp.
665 P.2d 661 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1983)
United States Steel Corp. v. Benefield
352 So. 2d 892 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1977)
City of Tucson v. Transamerica Title Insurance
545 P.2d 1004 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
109 P.2d 874, 62 Idaho 235, 1941 Ida. LEXIS 4, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alesko-v-union-pacific-railroad-idaho-1941.