Alejandro Rodriguez v. Timothy Robbins

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedAugust 13, 2015
Docket13-56706
StatusPublished

This text of Alejandro Rodriguez v. Timothy Robbins (Alejandro Rodriguez v. Timothy Robbins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Alejandro Rodriguez v. Timothy Robbins, (9th Cir. 2015).

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 13 2015

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ALEJANDRO RODRIGUEZ, for himself No. 13-56706 and on behalf of a class of similarly- situated individuals; ABDIRIZAK ADEN D.C. No. 2:07-cv-03239-TJH- FARAH, for himself and on behalf of a RNB class of similarly-situated individuals; JOSE FARIAS CORNEJO; YUSSUF ABDIKADIR; ABEL PEREZ RUELAS, ORDER

Petitioners - Appellees,

And

EFREN OROZCO,

Petitioner,

v.

TIMOTHY ROBBINS, Field Office Director, Los Angeles District, Immigration and Customs Enforcement; JEH JOHNSON, Secretary, Homeland Security; LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General; WESLEY LEE, Assistant Field Office Director, Immigration and Customs Enforcement; RODNEY PENNER, Captain, Mira Loma Detention Center; SANDRA HUTCHENS, Sheriff of Orange County; NGUYEN, Officer, Officer-in- Charge, Theo Lacy Facility; DAVIS NIGHSWONGER, Captain, Commander, Theo Lacy Facility; MIKE KREUGER, Captain, Operations Manager, James A. Musick Facility; ARTHUR EDWARDS, Officer-in-Charge, Santa Ana City Jail; RUSSELL DAVIS, Jail Administrator, Santa Ana City Jail; JUAN P. OSUNA, Director, Executive Office for Immigration Review,

Respondents - Appellants.

ALEJANDRO RODRIGUEZ, for himself No. 13-56755 and on behalf of a class of similarly- situated individuals; ABDIRIZAK ADEN D.C. No. 2:07-cv-03239-TJH- FARAH, for himself and on behalf of a RNB class of similarly-situated individuals; JOSE FARIAS CORNEJO; YUSSUF ABDIKADIR; ABEL PEREZ RUELAS,

Petitioners - Appellants,

TIMOTHY ROBBINS, Field Office Director, Los Angeles District, Immigration and Customs Enforcement; LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General; WESLEY LEE, Assistant Field Office Director, Immigration and Customs Enforcement; RODNEY PENNER, Captain, Mira Loma Detention Center; SANDRA HUTCHENS, Sheriff of Orange County; NGUYEN, Officer, Officer-in- Charge, Theo Lacy Facility; DAVIS NIGHSWONGER, Captain, Commander, Theo Lacy Facility; MIKE KREUGER, Captain, Operations Manager, James A. Musick Facility; RUSSELL DAVIS, Jail Administrator, Santa Ana City Jail; ARTHUR EDWARDS, Officer-in-Charge, Santa Ana City Jail; THOMAS G. SNOW, Acting Director, Executive Office for Immigration Review; JEH JOHNSON, Secretary, Homeland Security,

Respondents - Appellees.

Before: WARDLAW and GOULD, Circuit Judges and HADDON,* District Judge.

Counsel for Appellants/Cross-Appellees is ordered to show cause why sanctions

should not be imposed for the improper oral argument before this Court on July 24,

2015, based on an L.A. Times news article, published July 21, 2015, three days

before oral argument in this case, entitled “Suspect was fighting deportation,” the

source for which is identified as “federal authorities” and which directly references

and quotes from earlier proceedings in this case. Fed. R. App. P. 46(c); Circuit

Rule 46-2(a); ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct 3.5.

* The Honorable Sam E. Haddon, District Judge for the U.S. District Court for the District of Montana, sitting by designation.

3 Counsel shall also provide the Court and opposing counsel with copies of

the transcripts of the bond hearings for Mr. Keane Dean, including both the

preliminary and the Rodriguez hearings, as well as any other bond hearings that

may have taken place in Mr. Dean’s immigration proceedings, to which counsel

also improperly referred during the July 24, 2015 oral argument.

Counsel shall have 28 days from the date of this order to respond by letter

brief and to provide the transcripts.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Alejandro Rodriguez v. Timothy Robbins, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alejandro-rodriguez-v-timothy-robbins-ca9-2015.