Alejandre v. County of San Joaquin

District Court, E.D. California·Decided December 17, 2019·No. 2:19-cv-00233·Unknown

Opinion

Gregory B. Thomas (SBN 239870) E-mail: gthomas@bwslaw.com Michael A. Slater (SBN 318899) E-mail: mslater@bwslaw.com BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSEN, LLP 1901 Harrison Street, Suite 900 Oakland, CA 94612-3501 Tel: 510.273.8780 Fax: 510.839.9104 Attorneys for Defendant COUNTY OF SAN JOAQUIN CINDY M. ALEJANDRE; and DAVID Case No. 2:19-cv-00233-WBS-KJN GONZALEZ II as Co-Successors-in-Interest to Decedent David Gonzalez III, STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER Plaintiffs, | COUNTY OF SAN JOAQUIN, a municipal corporation; and DOES 1-50, inclusive, individually and in their official capacity as Sheriff's Deputies for the San Joaquin County Sheriff's Department, Defendants. 1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS Disclosure and discovery activity in this action are likely to involve production of confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the court to enter the following Stipulated Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to discovery and that the protection it affords from public disclosure and use extends only to the limited information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment E, WILLIAMS & STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER LLP OAK #4848-2304-5545 v1 -1- CASE NO □□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□

under the applicable legal principles. The parties further acknowledge, as set forth below, that this Stipulation and Order creates no entitlement to file confidential information under seal; and that Eastern District Local Rule 141 sets forth the procedures that must be followed and reflects the standards that will be applied when a party seeks permission from the court to file material under seal. 2. DEFINITIONS 2.1 Party: any party to this action, including all of its officers, directors, employees, consultants, retained experts, house counsel and outside counsel (and their support staff). 2.2 Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless of the medium or manner generated, stored or maintained (including, among other things, testimony, transcripts, or tangible things) that are produced or generated in disclosures or responses to discovery by any Party in this matter. 2.3 Confidential Information or Items: information (regardless of the medium or how generated, stored, or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for protection under standards developed under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c) and/or applicable federal privileges. This material includes, but is not limited to, medical and psychotherapeutic records; as well as peace officer personnel records as defined by California Penal Code sections 832.8, 832.5, 832.7 and the associated case law; and other similar confidential records designated as such. 2.4 Receiving Party: a Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery Material from a Producing Party, including a Party that has noticed or subpoenaed and is taking a deposition or comparable testimony. 2.5 Producing Party: a Party or non-party that produces Disclosure or Discovery Material in this action, including a Party that is defending a deposition noticed or subpoenaed by another Party; additionally, for the limited purpose of designating testimony subject to this Stipulation and Order pursuant to section 6.2(b) (infra), a “Producing Party” shall also be construed to include a Party that is attending and/or participating in a non-party deposition noticed/subpoenaed by another Party. E, WILLIAMS & Onc aguante 2. STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

2.6 Designating Party: a Party or non-party that designates information or items that it produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as “CONFIDENTIAL.” 2.7 Protected Material: any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is designated as “CONFIDENTIAL” under the provisions of this Stipulation and Protective Order. (The term “Confidential Document” shall be synonymous with the term “Protected Material” for the purposes of this Stipulation and Protective Order.) 2.8 Outside Counsel: attorneys who are not employees of a Party but who are retained to represent or advise a Party in this action (as well as their support staffs). 2.9 House Counsel: attorneys who are employees of a Party (as well as their support staffs). ll 2.10 Counsel (without qualifier): Outside Counsel and House Counsel (as well as their support staffs). 2.11. Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter pertinent to the litigation who has been retained by a Party or its counsel to serve as an expert witness or as a consultant in this action and who is not a past or a current employee of a Party and who, at the time of retention, is not anticipated to become an employee of a Party or a competitor of a Party’s; as well as any person retained, designated, or disclosed by a Party as an expert pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2). 2.12 Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation support services (e.g., photocopying; videotaping; translating; preparing exhibits or demonstrations; organizing, storing, retrieving data in any form or medium; etc.) and their employees and subcontractors. 3. SCOPE The protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order cover not only Protected Material/Confidential Documents (as defined above), but also: (1) any information copied or extracted from Protected Material; (2) all copies, excerpts, summaries, or compilations of Protected Material; and (3) any testimony, conversations, or presentations by Parties or their Counsel that might reveal Protected Material. However, the protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order do not cover the following information: (a) any information that is in the Onc aguante 3. STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Alejandre v. County of San Joaquin, (E.D. Cal. 2019).

Alejandre v. County of San Joaquin (Alejandre v. County of San Joaquin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.