Aldein v. Mid-Continental Quality Autos, Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Aldein v. Mid-Continental Quality Autos, Inc.

266 S.W.3d 888, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1584, 2008 WL 4707499

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedOctober 28, 2008

DocketED 90464

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 266 S.W.3d 888 (Aldein v. Mid-Continental Quality Autos, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Aldein v. Mid-Continental Quality Autos, Inc., 266 S.W.3d 888, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1584, 2008 WL 4707499 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Mid-Continental Quality Autos, Inc. (“MCQ”) appeals the trial court’s judgment in favor of Sam Aldein on his breach of contract claim. MCQ claims that the trial court erred in: (1) determining that it *889 was not common practice in the used car industry for a dealer to deduct from a buyer’s commission checks the cost of repairs to vehicles with undisclosed damage; and (2) finding that the terms of the parties’ contract did not anticipate cost-of-repair deductions. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the trial court’s decision was not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI