Aldein v. Mid-Continental Quality Autos, Inc.

266 S.W.3d 888, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1584, 2008 WL 4707499
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 28, 2008·No. ED 90464·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Mid-Continental Quality Autos, Inc. (“MCQ”) appeals the trial court’s judgment in favor of Sam Aldein on his breach of contract claim. MCQ claims that the trial court erred in: (1) determining that it *889 was not common practice in the used car industry for a dealer to deduct from a buyer’s commission checks the cost of repairs to vehicles with undisclosed damage; and (2) finding that the terms of the parties’ contract did not anticipate cost-of-repair deductions. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the trial court’s decision was not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Aldein v. Mid-Continental Quality Autos, Inc., 266 S.W.3d 888, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1584, 2008 WL 4707499 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

266 S.W.3d 888 (Aldein v. Mid-Continental Quality Autos, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Davis v. State
266 S.W.3d 888 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)