Alcantara v. Keyser

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided May 22, 2020·No. 1:20-cv-03079·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK QUIRY ALCANTARA, Petitioner, ORDER -against- 20 Civ. 3079 (ER) KEYSER, Respondent. EDGARDO RAMOS, United States District Judge: Petitioner, proceeding pro se, brings this petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Doc. 1. The Court having received notice that petitioner’s filing fee has been processed, the Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to serve a copy of the petition on the Attorney General of the State of New York and the District Attorney of Kings County. Respondents are directed to answer the petition within sixty (60) days of service; and Petitioner is directed to reply within thirty (30) days thereafter. A copy of this Order will be mailed to Petitioner. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith. Cf Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that appellant demonstrates good faith when seeking review of a nonfrivolous issue). It is SO ORDERED. Dated: May 22, 2020 00% New York, New York □ \—— EDGARDO RAMOS United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Alcantara v. Keyser, (S.D.N.Y. 2020).

Alcantara v. Keyser (Alcantara v. Keyser) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Coppedge v. United States
369 U.S. 438 (Supreme Court, 1962)