Alberts v. Alberts

190 A.D.2d 1016
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Alberts v. Alberts. Read the opinion of the Court — 168 A.D.2d 1004

Opinion

— Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Special Term did not abuse its discretion in awarding plaintiff $1000 in attorney’s fees and $1000 in accounting fees. We also find no abuse of discretion in the court’s denial of defendant’s cross motion for a downward modification of temporary maintenance and child support. In affirming, we reiterate our prior holdings that the remedy for any claimed inequity in a temporary award is a speedy trial, not an appeal (Clancy v Clancy, 122 AD2d 563; Cloutier v Cloutier, 94 AD2d 974; Kunerth v Kunerth, 58 AD2d 1010; Vesper v Vesper, 46 AD2d 729). (Appeals from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Wolfgang, J. — Divorce.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Boomer, Green, Boehm and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Alberts v. Alberts, 190 A.D.2d 1016 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

190 A.D.2d 1016 (Alberts v. Alberts) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Vesper v. Vesper
46 A.D.2d 729 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1974)
Kunerth v. Kunerth
58 A.D.2d 1010 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)
Cloutier v. Cloutier
94 A.D.2d 974 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)
Clancy v. Clancy
122 A.D.2d 563 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)