Alberts v. Alberts
This text of 190 A.D.2d 1016 (Alberts v. Alberts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Special Term did not abuse its discretion in awarding plaintiff $1000 in attorney’s fees and $1000 in accounting fees. We also find no abuse of discretion in the court’s denial of defendant’s cross motion for a downward modification of temporary maintenance and child support. In affirming, we reiterate our prior holdings that the remedy for any claimed inequity in a temporary award is a speedy trial, not an appeal (Clancy v Clancy, 122 AD2d 563; Cloutier v Cloutier, 94 AD2d 974; Kunerth v Kunerth, 58 AD2d 1010; Vesper v Vesper, 46 AD2d 729). (Appeals from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Wolfgang, J. — Divorce.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Boomer, Green, Boehm and Davis, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
190 A.D.2d 1016, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alberts-v-alberts-nyappdiv-1993.