Albert v. Parish of Rapides

230 So. 2d 836, 255 La. 342, 1970 La. LEXIS 3946
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedFebruary 23, 1970
DocketNo. 50349
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 230 So. 2d 836 (Albert v. Parish of Rapides) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Albert v. Parish of Rapides, 230 So. 2d 836, 255 La. 342, 1970 La. LEXIS 3946 (La. 1970).

Opinion

In re: James E. Albert, Robert Connella, Ralph O. Funk, James R. Roy and Henry B. Vandersypen applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition and mandamus. ¡,

The petition of the relator in the above entitled and numbered case having been duly considered,

It is ordered that a writ of certiorari issue herein, directing the Honorable A. M. D’Angelo, Judge of the Ninth Judicial District, Court for the Parish of Rapides, to transmit to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, on or before the 4th day of May, 1970, the record in duplicate, or a certified copy of the record in duplicate, of the proceed[344]*344ings complained of by the relator herein to the end that the validity of said proceedings may be ascertained.

It is further ordered that the aforesaid Judge of said Court and the respondent through his attorneys shall show cause, in this court, on the date aforesaid, at 11 o’clock A.M., why the relief prayed for in the petition of the relator should not be granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Albert v. Parish of Rapides
237 So. 2d 380 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1970)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
230 So. 2d 836, 255 La. 342, 1970 La. LEXIS 3946, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/albert-v-parish-of-rapides-la-1970.