Albert Duro v. Edward Reina, Chief of Police, Salt River Department of Public Safety, Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community

860 F.2d 1463, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 15961, 1988 WL 115270
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided November 2, 1988·No. 85-1718·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinions

ORDER

Judge Choy and Judge Brunetti have voted to deny the petition for rehearing and to , reject the suggestion for a rehearing en banc. Judge Sneed has voted to grant the petition for rehearing and recommends accepting the suggestion for a rehearing en banc.

The full court was advised of the suggestion for rehearing en banc. Fed.R.App.P. 35(b). A majority of the judges voted against en banc consideration. Judge Ko-zinski’s dissent from the order denying rehearing en banc is attached.

The petition for rehearing is denied and the suggestion for a rehearing en banc is rejected.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Albert Duro v. Edward Reina, Chief of Police, Salt River Department of Public Safety, Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community, 860 F.2d 1463, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 15961, 1988 WL 115270 (9th Cir. 1988).

860 F.2d 1463 (Albert Duro v. Edward Reina, Chief of Police, Salt River Department of Public Safety, Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Shale
Washington Supreme Court, 2015
United States v. Loera
952 F. Supp. 2d 862 (D. Arizona, 2013)
Kahawaiolaa v. Norton
222 F. Supp. 2d 1213 (D. Hawaii, 2002)
Duro v. Reina
495 U.S. 676 (Supreme Court, 1990)