Alan F. Stephan v. Earl B. Dowdle

Ninth Circuit

Alan F. Stephan v. Earl B. Dowdle

733 F.2d 642, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 22524

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedMay 14, 1984

Docket83-1946

StatusPublished

Cited by16 cases

This text of 733 F.2d 642 (Alan F. Stephan v. Earl B. Dowdle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Alan F. Stephan v. Earl B. Dowdle, 733 F.2d 642, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 22524 (9th Cir. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

SCHROEDER, Circuit Judge:

Alan F. Stephan, an Arizona state prisoner, appeals the dismissal of his federal civil rights action. The district court found that Stephan’s claims were barred by the applicable statute of limitations, and that Stephan’s confinement in prison did not toll the statute under Arizona’s tolling provision, Ariz.Rev.Stat. § 12-502.

The district court relied on Major v. Arizona State Prison, 642 F.2d 311 (9th Cir.1981), where this court held that § 12-502 did not toll the statute of limitations for prisoners. The Arizona Court of Appeals, however, in Smith v. MacDougall, 676 P.2d 656 (Ariz.App.1983), reached the opposite conclusion and held that under § 12-502, confinement in prison tolls the applicable statute of limitations. The Arizona Supreme Court has declined to review that decision. Because federal courts must look to state statutes of limitations and tolling provisions for actions brought under § 1983, see Board of Regents v. Tomanio, 446 U.S. 478, 483-85, 100 S.Ct. 1790, 1794-95, 64 L.Ed.2d 440 (1980), and are bound by a state court’s construction of the laws of that state, see Gentry v. MacDougall, 685 F.2d 322, 323 (9th Cir.1982), the holding in Major on the applicability of Arizona’s tolling provision to prisoners is no longer binding on this court and must be overruled.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SCHROEDER, Circuit Judge:

Alan F. Stephan, an Arizona state prisoner, appeals the dismissal of his federal civil rights action. The district court found that Stephan’s claims were barred by the applicable statute of limitations, and that Stephan’s confinement in prison did not toll the statute under Arizona’s tolling provision, Ariz.Rev.Stat. § 12-502.

The district court relied on Major v. Arizona State Prison, 642 F.2d 311 (9th Cir.1981), where this court held that § 12-502 did not toll the statute of limitations for prisoners. The Arizona Court of Appeals, however, in Smith v. MacDougall, 676 P.2d 656 (Ariz.App.1983), reached the opposite conclusion and held that under § 12-502, confinement in prison tolls the applicable statute of limitations. The Arizona Supreme Court has declined to review that decision. Because federal courts must look to state statutes of limitations and tolling provisions for actions brought under § 1983, see Board of Regents v. Tomanio, 446 U.S. 478, 483-85, 100 S.Ct. 1790, 1794-95, 64 L.Ed.2d 440 (1980), and are bound by a state court’s construction of the laws of that state, see Gentry v. MacDougall, 685 F.2d 322, 323 (9th Cir.1982), the holding in Major on the applicability of Arizona’s tolling provision to prisoners is no longer binding on this court and must be overruled.

Reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

733 F.2d 642, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 22524, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alan-f-stephan-v-earl-b-dowdle-ca9-1984.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack