Alabama Great Southern Railroad v. Hunt

Supreme Court of Georgia

Alabama Great Southern Railroad v. Hunt

72 S.E. 346, 136 Ga. 863, 1911 Ga. LEXIS 258

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedSeptember 26, 1911

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 72 S.E. 346 (Alabama Great Southern Railroad v. Hunt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Alabama Great Southern Railroad v. Hunt, 72 S.E. 346, 136 Ga. 863, 1911 Ga. LEXIS 258 (Ga. 1911).

Pincite

Opinion

Beck, J.

1. Grounds of a motion for a new trial alleging that the verdict was contrary to specified portions of the charge of the court are, in essence, merely complaints that the verdict was contrary to law. Atlanta Ry. &c. Co. v. Walker, 112 Ga. 725 (38 S. E. 107).

2. After careful examination of the grounds of the motion for a new trial complaining of the admission of evidence, and of the entire record in the case, it does not appear that the judge erred in refusing -to exclude the evidence the admission of which is complained of in those grounds.

3. There were no exceptions to any of the court’s instructions to the jury, and there was sufficient eviden.ee to support the verdict

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI