Al-Kidd v. Ashcroft

598 F.3d 1129, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 5604, 2010 WL 961855
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedMarch 18, 2010
DocketNo. 06-36059
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 598 F.3d 1129 (Al-Kidd v. Ashcroft) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Al-Kidd v. Ashcroft, 598 F.3d 1129, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 5604, 2010 WL 961855 (9th Cir. 2010).

Opinions

Concurrence by Judge MILAN D. SMITH, JR.; Dissent by Judge O’SCANNLAIN; Dissent by Judge GOULD.

ORDER

Judge M. Smith voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc, and Judge Thompson so recommended. Judge Bea voted to grant the petition for rehearing en banc.

The full court was advised of the petition for rehearing en banc. A judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc, and the matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the nonrecused active judges in favor of en banc consideration. Fed. R.App. P. 35. Judge Bybee was recused in this matter.

The petition for rehearing en banc is DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Patterson
276 F. Supp. 3d 994 (S.D. California, 2017)
Moss v. United States Secret Service
711 F.3d 941 (Ninth Circuit, 2013)
PACIFIC MARINE CENTER, INC. v. Silva
809 F. Supp. 2d 1266 (E.D. California, 2011)
Ashcroft v. al-Kidd
563 U.S. 731 (Supreme Court, 2011)
AL-KIDD v. Ashcroft
653 F.3d 982 (Ninth Circuit, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
598 F.3d 1129, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 5604, 2010 WL 961855, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/al-kidd-v-ashcroft-ca9-2010.