Al-Hakim v. Commissioner

1987 T.C. Memo. 136, 53 T.C.M. 352, 1987 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 136
CourtUnited States Tax Court
DecidedMarch 16, 1987
DocketDocket No. 22680-81, 8173-83, 34225-83.
StatusUnpublished

This text of 1987 T.C. Memo. 136 (Al-Hakim v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Tax Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Al-Hakim v. Commissioner, 1987 T.C. Memo. 136, 53 T.C.M. 352, 1987 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 136 (tax 1987).

Opinion

ABDUL JALIL AL-HAKIM, ET AL., 1 Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
Al-Hakim v. Commissioner
Docket No. 22680-81, 8173-83, 34225-83.
United States Tax Court
T.C. Memo 1987-136; 1987 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 136; 53 T.C.M. (CCH) 352; T.C.M. (RIA) 87136;
March 16, 1987.
Frederick John James, for the petitioners.
Neal o. Abreu, for the respondent.

CLAPP

MEMORANDUM FINDINGS OF FACT AND OPINION

CLAPP, Judge: In these consolidated cases, respondent determined deficiencies and additions*138 to tax in petitioners' Federal income tax as follows:

Additions to Tax
PetitionerYearDeficienciesSec. 6653(b) 2Sec. 6653(a)
al-Hakim1977$6,274.00$3,137.00
al-Hakim197845,583.00$2,279.00
The Genius of
Randy Wallace, Inc.
Ended 4/30/7914,887.00744.00

In an amended answer, respondent conceded the fraud addition for petitioner al-Hakim's 1977 taxable year and asserted in lieu thereof the additions to tax pursuant to section 6653(a) and section 6651(a)(1). In another amended answer, respondent asserted the addition to tax pursuant to section 6651(a)(1) for petitioner al-Hakim's 1978 taxable year. 3

After concessions, the issues for decision are: (1) whether al-Hakim's fee from Alvin Moore was $10,700 or $10,000; (2) whether fees from Alvin Moore and Cleopherus Smith should have been reported on al-Hakim's 1977 Federal individual*139 income tax return instead of his 1978 return; (3) whether al-Hakim should have reported a $112,500 fee from Lyman Bostock; 4) whether al-Hakim should have reported miscellaneous receipts of money; 5) whether the Genius of Randy Wallace, Inc. (Genius, Inc.), is entitled to a new jobs credit; 6) whether the section 6653(a) additions to tax apply to al-Hakim and Genius, Inc., for each of the years at issue; and 7) whether the section 6651(a)(1) additions to tax apply to al-Hakim for the taxable years 1977 and 1978.

For convenience, we have combined our findings of fact and opinion by issues. Some of the facts have been stipulated and are found accordingly. The stipulation of facts and the attached exhibits are incorporated by this reference.

Income From Alvin Moore and Cleopherus Smith

FINDINGS OF FACT

In 1970, petitioner Abdul Jalil al-Hakim (al-Hakim) began to negotiate contracts for professional athletes. He operated as a sole proprietor under the name "Superstar Management, the Genius of Randy Wallace" and maintained a business checking account (business account) at Lloyd's Bank in Oakland, California.

al-Hakim and the athletes executed special powers of attorney which*140 authorized al-Hakim to negotiate contracts for them and provided that al-Hakim was to receive a fee for any contract he negotiated. The Special Power of Attorney, which al-Hakim and the athletes used during the years at issue, was as follows:

SPECIAL POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, That I,    , Player, of       have made, constituted, and appointed, and by these presents, do make, constitute, and appoint Abdul-Jalil al-Hakim, acting exclusively for and on behalf of Super Star Management, A California Entity, my true and lawful attorney for me and in my name, place and stead to:

Negotiate on behalf of myself and advise me as to any and all contractural agreements with respect to ORGANIZED PROFESSIONAL ATHLETICS. This Power of Attorney extends to and includes negotiations by and between myself and any and all specific teams of any league.

Giving and granting unto said attorney full power and authority to do and perform every act necessary and proper to be done in the exercise of any of the foregoing powers as fully as I might or could do if personally present, with full power of substitution and revocation, hereby ratifying and confirming all that*141 my said attorney shall lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

This Power of Attorney is granted for a period of      , and shall become effective on      , and shall terminate on      .

For value received, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, I do hereby grant said attorney in fact, all expenses at my cost, and the sum, whichever is greater, of a minimum fee of one thousand dollars ($1,000.00) or a FIVE per cent (5%)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Welch v. Helvering
290 U.S. 111 (Supreme Court, 1933)
Hempt Bros., Inc. v. United States
490 F.2d 1172 (Third Circuit, 1974)
Kniffen v. Commissioner
39 T.C. 553 (U.S. Tax Court, 1962)
Bunnel v. Commissioner
50 T.C. 837 (U.S. Tax Court, 1968)
Anders v. Commissioner
68 T.C. 474 (U.S. Tax Court, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1987 T.C. Memo. 136, 53 T.C.M. 352, 1987 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 136, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/al-hakim-v-commissioner-tax-1987.