Al-Habasha v. Roanoke City Schools

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 29, 2010·No. 10-1240·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-1240

AMINA AL-HABASHA,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

ROANOKE CITY SCHOOLS,

Defendant – Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District Judge. (7:07-cv-00460-jct)

Submitted: June 24, 2010 Decided: June 29, 2010

Before DUNCAN, AGEE, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Amina Al-Habasha, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Kay Dillon, GUYNN, MEMMER & DILLON, PC, Salem, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Amina Al-Habasha appeals the district court’s order

denying her motion for relief from judgment pursuant to Fed. R.

Civ. P. 60(b), in which she sought to reinstate her employment

discrimination action, which was dismissed after she failed to

effect service on the Defendant despite several extensions of

time to do so. We have reviewed the record and find no abuse of

discretion and no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for

the reasons stated by the district court. Al-Habasha v. Roanoke

City Schs., No. 7:07-cv-00460-jct (W.D. Va. Feb. 2, 2010). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Al-Habasha v. Roanoke City Schools, (4th Cir. 2010).

Al-Habasha v. Roanoke City Schools (Al-Habasha v. Roanoke City Schools) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.