Al-Habasha v. Roanoke City Schools

385 F. App'x 347
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 29, 2010·No. No. 10-1240·Published

Opinion

[348]*348Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Amina Al-Habasha appeals the district court’s order denying her motion for relief from judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b), in which she sought to reinstate her employment discrimination action, which was dismissed after she failed to effect service on the Defendant despite several extensions of time to do so. We have reviewed the record and find no abuse of discretion and no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Al-Habasha v. Roanoke City Schs., No. 7:07-cv-00460-jct (W.D.Va. Feb. 2, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Al-Habasha v. Roanoke City Schools, 385 F. App'x 347 (4th Cir. 2010).

385 F. App'x 347 (Al-Habasha v. Roanoke City Schools) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.