Akron Bar Assn. v. Coombs

Ohio Supreme Court

Akron Bar Assn. v. Coombs

2000 Ohio 371, 88 Ohio St. 3d 1239

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedApril 18, 2000

Docket1998-2656

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 2000 Ohio 371 (Akron Bar Assn. v. Coombs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Akron Bar Assn. v. Coombs, 2000 Ohio 371, 88 Ohio St. 3d 1239 (Ohio 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 88 Ohio St.3d 1239.]

AKRON BAR ASSOCIATION v. COOMBS. [Cite as Akron Bar Assn. v. Coombs, 2000-Ohio-371.] (No. 98-2656—Submitted and decided April 18, 2000.) ON APPLICATION FOR TERMINATION OF PROBATION. __________________ {¶ 1} On April 28, 1999, this court suspended respondent, Robert J. Coombs, for six months, with six months stayed and respondent placed on six months of probation. On March 27, 2000, respondent filed an application for termination of probation. The court finds that respondent has substantially complied with Gov.Bar R. V(9)(D) and with its April 28, 1999 order. {¶ 2} THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED by the court that the probation of Robert J. Coombs, Attorney Registration No. 0058755, last known business address in Akron, Ohio, be, and hereby is, terminated. {¶ 3} IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, sua sponte, by the court, that within ninety days of the date of this order, respondent shall reimburse any amounts that have been awarded against the respondent by the Clients’ Security Fund pursuant to Gov.Bar R. VIII(7)(F). It is further ordered, sua sponte, by the court that if, after the date of this order, the Clients’ Security Fund awards any amount against the respondent pursuant to Gov.Bar R. VIII(7)(F), the respondent shall reimburse that amount to the Clients’ Security Fund within ninety days of the notice of such award. {¶ 4} IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication. {¶ 5} For earlier case, see Akron Bar Assn. v. Coombs (1999), 85 Ohio St.3d 391, 709 N.E.2d 108. SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. __________________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 88 Ohio St.3d 1239.]

AKRON BAR ASSOCIATION v. COOMBS. [Cite as Akron Bar Assn. v. Coombs, 2000-Ohio-371.] (No. 98-2656—Submitted and decided April 18, 2000.) ON APPLICATION FOR TERMINATION OF PROBATION. __________________ {¶ 1} On April 28, 1999, this court suspended respondent, Robert J. Coombs, for six months, with six months stayed and respondent placed on six months of probation. On March 27, 2000, respondent filed an application for termination of probation. The court finds that respondent has substantially complied with Gov.Bar R. V(9)(D) and with its April 28, 1999 order. {¶ 2} THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED by the court that the probation of Robert J. Coombs, Attorney Registration No. 0058755, last known business address in Akron, Ohio, be, and hereby is, terminated. {¶ 3} IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, sua sponte, by the court, that within ninety days of the date of this order, respondent shall reimburse any amounts that have been awarded against the respondent by the Clients’ Security Fund pursuant to Gov.Bar R. VIII(7)(F). It is further ordered, sua sponte, by the court that if, after the date of this order, the Clients’ Security Fund awards any amount against the respondent pursuant to Gov.Bar R. VIII(7)(F), the respondent shall reimburse that amount to the Clients’ Security Fund within ninety days of the notice of such award. {¶ 4} IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication. {¶ 5} For earlier case, see Akron Bar Assn. v. Coombs (1999), 85 Ohio St.3d 391, 709 N.E.2d 108. SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. __________________

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2000 Ohio 371, 88 Ohio St. 3d 1239, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/akron-bar-assn-v-coombs-ohio-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack