Akron Bar Ass'n v. Bojonell
724 N.E.2d 401, 88 Ohio St. 3d 154
Opinion
As we have previously held in a matter very similar to this, representing others by advising them of their rights and communicating on their behalf to adverse parties about settlements of causes of action constitutes the practice of law. Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Cromwell (1998), 82 Ohio St.3d 255, 695 N.E.2d 243.
Respondent is hereby enjoined from engaging in any further activities that might constitute the unauthorized practice of law. Cost are taxed to respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Akron Bar Ass'n v. Bojonell, 724 N.E.2d 401, 88 Ohio St. 3d 154 (Ohio 2000).
724 N.E.2d 401 (Akron Bar Ass'n v. Bojonell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Foreclosure Solutions, L.L.C.
2009 Ohio 4174 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2009)
Disciplinary Counsel v. Robson
878 N.E.2d 1042 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2007)
Bergantzel v. Mlynarik
619 N.W.2d 309 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 2000)
Akron Bar Assn. v. Bojonell
2000 Ohio 287 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2000)