Akridge v. Cupp
587 P.2d 461, 284 Or. 423, 1978 Ore. LEXIS 1179
This text of 587 P.2d 461 (Akridge v. Cupp) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Akridge v. Cupp, 587 P.2d 461, 284 Or. 423, 1978 Ore. LEXIS 1179 (Or. 1978).
Opinion
Petitioners in these habeas corpus proceedings, consolidated for appeal and review, now move this court for an order allowing attorney fees and costs incurred in the presentation of their petition for review. Today’s decision in Penrod v. Cupp and Brown v. Cupp, 284 Or 417, 587 P2d 96 (1978), holds that there is no statutory basis for such an order by this court. The motion is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Penrod v. Cupp
587 P.2d 96 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1978)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
587 P.2d 461, 284 Or. 423, 1978 Ore. LEXIS 1179, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/akridge-v-cupp-or-1978.