Akin Mobile Homes, Inc. v. Secretary of Housing & Urban Development and Department of Housing & Urban Development, Etc.

475 F.2d 1261, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 11325
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedMarch 5, 1973
Docket72-3572
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 475 F.2d 1261 (Akin Mobile Homes, Inc. v. Secretary of Housing & Urban Development and Department of Housing & Urban Development, Etc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Akin Mobile Homes, Inc. v. Secretary of Housing & Urban Development and Department of Housing & Urban Development, Etc., 475 F.2d 1261, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 11325 (5th Cir. 1973).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The appellant’s suit was dismissed below without prejudice to the plaintiff’s right to sue the United States under the Tucker Act 1 in the U. S. Court of Claims. 2

The suit arose out of a dispute concerning contractual negotiations between the parties for the lease on an emergency basis of approximately 400 mobile homes to HUD for the use of residents of Southern Mississippi rendered homeless by Hurricane Camille, which struck the Mississippi Gulf Coast on August 17, 1969. According to the complaint the plaintiff was required to pay state and local taxes in the amount of $76,002.25, an item not contemplated in the telegraphic negotiations between the parties. The complaint alleged that HUD had renegotiated other contracts to take care of similar inequities with other lessors similarly situated, and that officials of HUD had failed and refused to renegotiate appellant’s contract.

The district judge was not in error in concluding that this case should be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction and further that Title 12, U.S.C., Section 1702, does not provide a basis for concurrent jurisdiction of the district court with the Court of Claims. The judgment appealed from is Affirmed.

1

. The amount claimed exceeded the district court’s $10,000 limitation pi jurisdiction under the Tucker Act, Title 28, U.S.C., Section 1346(a)(2).

2

. The memorandum-opinion and judgment of the lower court are reported sub nom. Akin Mobile Homes, Inc., a Mississippi Corporation v. Secretary of Housing & Urban Development and Department of Housing & Urban Development, An Agency of the U. S. Government, Washington, D.C., S.D.Miss.1972, 354 F.Supp. 1036.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
475 F.2d 1261, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 11325, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/akin-mobile-homes-inc-v-secretary-of-housing-urban-development-and-ca5-1973.