Akers v. Weinshienk

327 F. App'x 811
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
DecidedJune 24, 2009
Docket08-1471
StatusUnpublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 327 F. App'x 811 (Akers v. Weinshienk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Akers v. Weinshienk, 327 F. App'x 811 (10th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

MONROE G. McKAY, Circuit Judge.

This Bivens action was dismissed sua sponte by a district court judge named as a defendant. Under 28 U.S.C. § 455(b)(5), a judge must recuse when named as a party to a proceeding. Accordingly, we REVERSE and REMAND this case for reassignment to a judge not named as a party in the complaint. This order neither makes nor implies any view about the appropriate disposition after reassignment.

We GRANT Plaintiffs motion to proceed without prepayment of fees and remind him of his continuing obligation to make partial payments until the filing fee has been paid in full. We DENY all other pending motions.

*

This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R.App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1.

After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2). Therefore, this case is ordered submitted without oral argument.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Akers v. Weinshienk
374 F. App'x 794 (Tenth Circuit, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
327 F. App'x 811, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/akers-v-weinshienk-ca10-2009.