Akash Dixit v. Tanya Singh Dixit

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided November 14, 2017·No. A18D0152·Published

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ November 08, 2017

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A18D0152. AKASH DIXIT v. TANYA SINGH DIXIT

Upon consideration of this Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

The only issue that appears to have merit is applicant’s contention that the Order on Motion for Attorney Fees, at page 5, item 3, erroneously awards attorney fees under OCGA § 9-15-14 for fees incurred in connection with appellate proceedings. See Kautter v. Kautter, 286 Ga. 16, 19 (4) (c) (685 SE2d 266) (2009).

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 11/08/2017 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Akash Dixit v. Tanya Singh Dixit, (Ga. Ct. App. 2017).

Akash Dixit v. Tanya Singh Dixit (Akash Dixit v. Tanya Singh Dixit) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kautter v. Kautter
685 S.E.2d 266 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2009)