Akamai Technologies, Inc. v. Limelight Networks, Inc.

612 F. App'x 617
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided August 13, 2015·No. Nos. 2009-1372, 2009-1380, 2009-1416, 2009-1417·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

PER CURIAM.

ORDER

A petition for rehearing en banc was filed by Plaintiffs-Appellants Akamai Technologies, Inc. and The Massachusetts Institute of Technology and a response thereto was invited by the court and filed by Limelight Networks, Inc.

[618]*618The petition for rehearing was considered by the panel that heard the appeal, and thereafter the petition for rehearing en banc, response, and briefs of amici curiae were referred to the circuit judges who are authorized to request a poll of whether to rehear the appeal en banc. A poll was requested and taken, and the court has' decided that the appeal warrants en banc consideration.

Upon consideration thereof,

It Is Ordered That:

(1) The petition for rehearing en banc filed by Akamai Technologies, Inc. and The Massachusetts Institute of Technology is granted.

(2) The court’s opinion of May IB, 2015, is vacated, the court’s en banc opinion is issued herewith, and the case is returned to the merits panel for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Akamai Technologies, Inc. v. Limelight Networks, Inc., 612 F. App'x 617 (Fed. Cir. 2015).

612 F. App'x 617 (Akamai Technologies, Inc. v. Limelight Networks, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mankes v. Vivid Seats Ltd.
822 F.3d 1302 (Federal Circuit, 2016)
Lilly v. Teva Parenteral Medicines, Inc.
126 F. Supp. 3d 1037 (S.D. Indiana, 2015)