Akamai Technologies, Inc. v. Limelight Networks, Inc.

Federal Circuit

Akamai Technologies, Inc. v. Limelight Networks, Inc.

571 F. App'x 958

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Akamai Technologies, Inc. v. Limelight Networks, Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 797 F.3d 1020 →

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided July 24, 2014·No. Nos. 2009-1372, 2009-1380, 2009-1416, 2009-1417·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On June 2, 2014, the Supreme Court reversed with costs the judgment of this court and remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court’s opinion.

Accordingly,

It is Ordered That:

1. The mandate of this court issued on November 5, 2012 is recalled, the appeals are reinstated, and this court’s judgment is vacated.

2. Pursuant to IOP # 14, the en banc court has determined to dissolve its en banc status and refer the case to the two [959] remaining panel members and a newly-selected judge.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On June 2, 2014, the Supreme Court reversed with costs the judgment of this court and remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court’s opinion.

Accordingly,

It is Ordered That:

1. The mandate of this court issued on November 5, 2012 is recalled, the appeals are reinstated, and this court’s judgment is vacated.

2. Pursuant to IOP # 14, the en banc court has determined to dissolve its en banc status and refer the case to the two [959] remaining panel members and a newly-selected judge.

Akamai Technologies, Inc. v. Limelight Networks, Inc., 571 F. App'x 958 (Fed. Cir. 2014).

Pincite

571 F. App'x 958 (Akamai Technologies, Inc. v. Limelight Networks, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.