Airhart v. City of Aberdeen

CourtDistrict Court, W.D. Washington
DecidedFebruary 25, 2021
Docket3:19-cv-06000
StatusUnknown

This text of Airhart v. City of Aberdeen (Airhart v. City of Aberdeen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, W.D. Washington primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Airhart v. City of Aberdeen, (W.D. Wash. 2021).

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 8 AT TACOMA

9 ANTHONY AIRHART et al., NO. 3:19−cv−06000−BHS Plaintiffs, 10 11 v . S OT RI DPU ERLA FT OE RD C M OO NT TI IO NN U AA NN CD E OF DEADLINES AND ISSUANCE OF 12 CITY OF ABERDEEN, AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER Defendant. 13 (Clerk’s Action Required)

15 I. RELIEF REQUESTED 16 COME NOW the parties and hereby jointly bring this stipulated motion for an order 17 continuing the deadline for Disclosure of Expert Witness Testimony from March 1, 2021 to April 18 1, 2021, continuing the deadline for Disclosure of Rebuttal Expert Witness Testimony from 19 March 31, 2021 to April 30, 2021, continuing the deadline for motions related to discovery to be 20 filed from April 12, 2021 to April 26, 2021, and continuing the deadline for Discovery completion 21 from May 10, 2021 to May 21, 2021. All other case deadlines to remain the same. 22 23 II. FACTS This case involves issues surrounding ground and surface water runoff from the Defendant 24 City of Aberdeen’s property onto Plaintiffs Airharts’ property. The parties have been in discovery, 25 STIPULATED MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE OF GOLDSTEIN LAW OFFICE, PLLC

DEADLINE (3:19-cv-06000-BHS) - 1 1800 Cooper Point Road Southwest, No. 8 1 but there is a pending site visit by expert witnesses to the Defendant City of Aberdeen’s property 2 on February 26, 2021. 3 The parties have been cooperating in discovery and both parties have submitted written 4 discovery responses and produced documents in response to written discovery; however, the parties would like to allow the expert witnesses time to incorporate the information obtained from 5 the pending site visit into their opinions. 6 Trial is currently scheduled for September 7, 2021 and this motion does not reschedule 7 the trial. 8

9 III. AUTHORITY 10 Granting this stipulated motion will foster judicial economy and serve the interests of 11 justice. FRCP 6(b)(1)(a) and LCR 16(b)(6) allow the court to extend time for good cause with or 12 without motion or notice if the court acts, or if a request is made, before the original time or its 13 extension expires. 14 A motion for continuance is within the sound discretion of the trial court. Swope v. 15 Sundgren, 73 Wn.2d 747, 749, 440 P.2d 494, 495 (1968). A trial court, in granting its discretion 16 to grant adjustment of a trial date, may consider elements including the reasons of the moving 17 party, effects on the adverse party, the need to resolve the issue and terminate the litigation 18 without undue delay, the history of litigation, any previous continuances, and other material 19 matters affecting the exercise of the court’s discretion. Willapa Trading Co. v. Muscanto, 45 Wn. 20 App. 779, 785-86, 727 P.2d 687 (1986). 21 Good cause exists warranting this continuance of the deadlines and adjusting the case schedule for the reasons stated above. Additionally, the parties agree that a continuance is 22 warranted, as is the issuance of an amended case schedule. No party to this action will be 23 prejudiced by the allowance of this continuance. Granting the requested continuance and issuing 24 an amended case schedule order will only foster the orderly and efficient administration of justice. 25 STIPULATED MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE OF GOLDSTEIN LAW OFFICE, PLLC

DEADLINE (3:19-cv-06000-BHS) - 2 1800 Cooper Point Road Southwest, No. 8 1 IV. CONCLUSION 2 For the foregoing reasons, the parties respectfully request this Court grant this Stipulated 3 motion continuing the deadline for Disclosure of Expert Witness Testimony from March 1, 2021 4 to April 1, 2021, continuing the deadline for Disclosure of Rebuttal Expert Witness Testimony from March 31, 2021 to April 30, 2021, continuing the deadline for motions related to discovery 5 to be filed from April 12, 2021 to April 26, 2021, and continuing the deadline for Discovery 6 completion from May 10, 2021 to May 21, 2021. All other case deadlines to remain the same. 7 Dated February 23, 2021. 8 /s/ 9 ________________________________ ________________________________ L. KATHLEEN CASPER, WSBA #38838 JEFFREY S. MYERS, WSBA # 16390 10 Goldstein Law Office, PLLC Law, Lyman, Daniel, Kamerrer & 1800 Cooper Pt. Rd. SW, #8 Bogdanovich, PS 11 Olympia, WA 98502 POB 11880, (360) 352-1970 Olympia, WA 98502 12 E: kathleen@jaglaw.net (360) 754-3480 13 Of Attorneys for Plaintiffs Airhart E: jmyers@lldkb.com Of Attorneys for Defendant City of 14 Aberdeen

16 ORDER 17 THIS MATTER, having come before the Court on the parties’ Stipulated Motion and 18 Order for Continuance of Deadline for Disclosure of Expert Testimony and Issuance of Amended 19 Scheduling Order, and the Court now considering itself fully advised, having reviewed the 20 parties’ stipulated motion and the court file, 21 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties’ Motion for Continuance of Deadline for 22 Disclosure of Expert Testimony and Issuance of Amended Case Schedule Order is GRANTED; 23 The Clerk shall issue an amended Order Setting Bench Trial and Pretrial Dates, and shall 24 schedule the deadline for Disclosure of Expert Witness Testimony as April 1, 2021, the deadline 25 for Disclosure of Rebuttal Expert Witness Testimony as April 30, 2021, the deadline for motions STIPULATED MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE OF GOLDSTEIN LAW OFFICE, PLLC

DEADLINE (3:19-cv-06000-BHS) - 3 1800 Cooper Point Road Southwest, No. 8 1 related to discovery to be filed as April 26, 2021, and the deadline for Discovery completion as 2 May 21, 2021. All other case deadlines to remain the same. 3 4 Dated this 25th day of February, 2021.

6 A 7 8 BENJAMIN H. SETTLE 9 United States District Judge 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 STIPULATED MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE OF GOLDSTEIN LAW OFFICE, PLLC

DEADLINE (3:19-cv-06000-BHS) - 4 1800 Cooper Point Road Southwest, No. 8

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Willapa Trading Co. v. Muscanto, Inc.
727 P.2d 687 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 1986)
Swope v. Sundgren
440 P.2d 494 (Washington Supreme Court, 1968)
Curry v. Wilson
87 P. 1065 (Washington Supreme Court, 1906)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Airhart v. City of Aberdeen, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/airhart-v-city-of-aberdeen-wawd-2021.