Aikens v. State
25 So. 3d 1283, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 520, 2010 WL 289102
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Aikens v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 3261 →
Opinion
Affirmed.
The claim was time-barred, see Hughes v. State, 22 So.3d 132 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009). In addition, under the facts of this case, the erroneous use of “and/or” in the jury instruction did not constitute fundamental error, see Garzon v. State, 980 So.2d 1038 (Fla.2008).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Aikens v. State, 25 So. 3d 1283, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 520, 2010 WL 289102 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).
25 So. 3d 1283 (Aikens v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hughes v. State
22 So. 3d 132 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)
Garzon v. State
980 So. 2d 1038 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2008)