Aikens v. State
25 So. 3d 1283, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 520, 2010 WL 289102
This text of 25 So. 3d 1283 (Aikens v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Aikens v. State, 25 So. 3d 1283, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 520, 2010 WL 289102 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).
Opinion
Affirmed.
The claim was time-barred, see Hughes v. State, 22 So.3d 132 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009). In addition, under the facts of this case, the erroneous use of “and/or” in the jury instruction did not constitute fundamental error, see Garzon v. State, 980 So.2d 1038 (Fla.2008).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Hughes v. State
22 So. 3d 132 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)
Garzon v. State
980 So. 2d 1038 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2008)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
25 So. 3d 1283, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 520, 2010 WL 289102, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aikens-v-state-fladistctapp-2010.