Aiken v. Aiken

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Aiken v. Aiken

206 A.D.2d 399, 616 N.Y.S.2d 186, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7307

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 11, 1994·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the husband from an order of the Family Court, Westchester County (Murphy, J.), entered February 14, 1992.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements, for reasons stated by Judge Murphy of the Family Court.

We note, however, that pursuant to this Court’s decision in Matter of Cassano v Cassano (203 AD2d 563), open-ended awards for future unreimbursed medical expenses are not improper (see, Family Ct Act § 413 [1] [c] [5]; Domestic Relations Law § 240 [1-b] [c] [5]). Sullivan, J. P., Pizzuto, Santucci and Friedmann, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the husband from an order of the Family Court, Westchester County (Murphy, J.), entered February 14, 1992.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements, for reasons stated by Judge Murphy of the Family Court.

We note, however, that pursuant to this Court’s decision in Matter of Cassano v Cassano (203 AD2d 563), open-ended awards for future unreimbursed medical expenses are not improper (see, Family Ct Act § 413 [1] [c] [5]; Domestic Relations Law § 240 [1-b] [c] [5]). Sullivan, J. P., Pizzuto, Santucci and Friedmann, JJ., concur.

Aiken v. Aiken, 206 A.D.2d 399, 616 N.Y.S.2d 186, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7307 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

206 A.D.2d 399 (Aiken v. Aiken) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related