Aiken v. Aiken
This text of 206 A.D.2d 399 (Aiken v. Aiken) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by the husband from an order of the Family Court, Westchester County (Murphy, J.), entered February 14, 1992.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements, for reasons stated by Judge Murphy of the Family Court.
We note, however, that pursuant to this Court’s decision in Matter of Cassano v Cassano (203 AD2d 563), open-ended awards for future unreimbursed medical expenses are not improper (see, Family Ct Act § 413 [1] [c] [5]; Domestic Relations Law § 240 [1-b] [c] [5]). Sullivan, J. P., Pizzuto, Santucci and Friedmann, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
206 A.D.2d 399, 616 N.Y.S.2d 186, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7307, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aiken-v-aiken-nyappdiv-1994.