Ahmed v. Washington
284 F.3d 1322, 2002 Daily Journal DAR 3507, 2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2891, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 5777, 2002 WL 497018
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ahmed v. Washington. Read the opinion of the Court — 276 F.3d 464 →
Opinion
ORDER
Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-euséd regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ahmed v. Washington, 284 F.3d 1322, 2002 Daily Journal DAR 3507, 2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2891, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 5777, 2002 WL 497018 (9th Cir. 2002).
284 F.3d 1322 (Ahmed v. Washington) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.