Ahmed v. Washington
284 F.3d 1322, 2002 Daily Journal DAR 3507, 2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2891, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 5777, 2002 WL 497018
This text of 284 F.3d 1322 (Ahmed v. Washington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Ahmed v. Washington, 284 F.3d 1322, 2002 Daily Journal DAR 3507, 2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2891, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 5777, 2002 WL 497018 (9th Cir. 2002).
Opinion
ORDER
Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-euséd regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
284 F.3d 1322, 2002 Daily Journal DAR 3507, 2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2891, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 5777, 2002 WL 497018, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ahmed-v-washington-ca9-2002.