Ahmed Ashour v. Arizona Beverages USA LLC

S.D. New York

Ahmed Ashour v. Arizona Beverages USA LLC

DecidedFebruary 13, 2023

Docket1:19-cv-07081

StatusUnknown

This text of Ahmed Ashour v. Arizona Beverages USA LLC (Ahmed Ashour v. Arizona Beverages USA LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ahmed Ashour v. Arizona Beverages USA LLC, (S.D.N.Y. 2023).

Pincite

Opinion

Stevens @ Lee 669 River Drive, Suite 201 Elmwood Park, NJ 07407 (201) 857-6760 Direct Dial: (201) 857-6778 MI E MI O E N DO RS E D. Email: robert.donovan@stevenslee.com Direct Fax: (610) 371-7938 February 9, 2023 application DENIED. VIA E-FILING SO ORDERED. Honorable Ona T. Wang, U.S.M.J. + United States District Court CE enn Southern District of New York □□ — 2 Daniel Patrick Moynihan Courthouse Ce 500 Pearl Street, Courtroom 20D Ona T. Wang 2/13/23 New York, New York 10007 U.S.M.J. Re: Ahmed Ashour, et al, v. Arizona Beverages USA LLC, et al. Index No. 19-ev-07081 (AT)(OTW) Defendants’ Request for a Stay of Enforcement of February 3, 2023 Order Dear Judge Wang: This firm represents defendants (“Defendants”). Defendants will be filing objections, under Rule 72(a), with regard to Your Honor’s order entered February 3, 2023. (ECF No. 230). Defendants therefore respectfully request that the Court stay enforcement of the February 3, 2023 order pending review under Rule 72(a). A stay is warranted here because, absent one, Defendants would be deprived of an opportunity for an orderly review. See Cazaubon v. Korean Air Lines Co., Ltd., No. CV-07-2197 (NGG)(JO), 2007 WL 1592979, at *4 (E.D. N.Y. June 1, 2007) (where the court, sua sponte, entered a stay of a remand order for a period of time sufficient for defendant to file objections with the District Judge assigned to the case). Defendants consent to any necessary extension of the current fact discovery deadline, in connection with this request, so as to avoid prejudice to Plaintiffs. Thank you for Your Honor’s attention to this matter. Respectfully submitted, Robert P novan ce: (All counsel of record via ECF)

Allentown e BergenCounty e« BalaCynwyd e Cleveland « FortLauderdale « Harrisburg « Lancaster » New York Philadelphia « Princeton « Reading * Rochester □ Scranton e ValleyForge » Wilkes-Barre »« Wilmington A PA PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 02/09/2023 SL1 1828037v1 115260.00002

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stevens @ Lee 669 River Drive, Suite 201 Elmwood Park, NJ 07407 (201) 857-6760 Direct Dial: (201) 857-6778 MI E MI O E N DO RS E D. Email: robert.donovan@stevenslee.com Direct Fax: (610) 371-7938 February 9, 2023 application DENIED. VIA E-FILING SO ORDERED. Honorable Ona T. Wang, U.S.M.J. + United States District Court CE enn Southern District of New York □□ — 2 Daniel Patrick Moynihan Courthouse Ce 500 Pearl Street, Courtroom 20D Ona T. Wang 2/13/23 New York, New York 10007 U.S.M.J. Re: Ahmed Ashour, et al, v. Arizona Beverages USA LLC, et al. Index No. 19-ev-07081 (AT)(OTW) Defendants’ Request for a Stay of Enforcement of February 3, 2023 Order Dear Judge Wang: This firm represents defendants (“Defendants”). Defendants will be filing objections, under Rule 72(a), with regard to Your Honor’s order entered February 3, 2023. (ECF No. 230). Defendants therefore respectfully request that the Court stay enforcement of the February 3, 2023 order pending review under Rule 72(a). A stay is warranted here because, absent one, Defendants would be deprived of an opportunity for an orderly review. See Cazaubon v. Korean Air Lines Co., Ltd., No. CV-07-2197 (NGG)(JO), 2007 WL 1592979, at *4 (E.D. N.Y. June 1, 2007) (where the court, sua sponte, entered a stay of a remand order for a period of time sufficient for defendant to file objections with the District Judge assigned to the case). Defendants consent to any necessary extension of the current fact discovery deadline, in connection with this request, so as to avoid prejudice to Plaintiffs. Thank you for Your Honor’s attention to this matter. Respectfully submitted, Robert P novan ce: (All counsel of record via ECF)

Allentown e BergenCounty e« BalaCynwyd e Cleveland « FortLauderdale « Harrisburg « Lancaster » New York Philadelphia « Princeton « Reading * Rochester □ Scranton e ValleyForge » Wilkes-Barre »« Wilmington A PA PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 02/09/2023 SL1 1828037v1 115260.00002

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Ahmed Ashour v. Arizona Beverages USA LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ahmed-ashour-v-arizona-beverages-usa-llc-nysd-2023.