Aguirre v. Hubbard
This text of 167 F. App'x 668 (Aguirre v. Hubbard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
California state prisoner Curtis Eugene Aguirre appeals from the district court’s order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition challenging his twenty-five years to life sentence imposed after his no contest plea for possession of 0.1 gram of a substance containing methamphetamine. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253. We review de novo, Eslaminia v. White, 136 F.3d 1234, 1236 (9th Cir.1998), and we dismiss.
Aguirre contends that his sentence constitutes cruel and unusual punishment, in violation of the Eighth Amendment. His contention is procedurally barred, see Coleman v. Thompson, 501 U.S. 722, 729, 111 S.Ct. 2546, 115 L.Ed.2d 640 (1991), and lacks merit, see Lockyer v. Andrade, 538 U.S. 63, 123 S.Ct. 1166, 155 L.Ed.2d 144 (2003); Ewing v. California, 538 U.S. 11, 123 S.Ct. 1179, 155 L.Ed.2d 108 (2003); Rios v. Garcia, 390 F.3d 1082, 1086 (9th Cir.2004).
DISMISSED
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
167 F. App'x 668, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aguirre-v-hubbard-ca9-2006.